Fake Facial Hair for Sale
[From
Playboy for November 1968. Click to enlarge.]
I can imagine a man being follicle-challenged and able only to grow a patchy beard or mustache. But most of us can grow a perfectly fine crop of facial hair for free. Why would anyone spend money for a fake? And the price! The Inflation Calculator I always use says: "What cost $30 in 1968 would cost $185.89 in 2010."
But the weirdest thing is the appeal to scam your girlfriend or one-night-stand with fake hair. Huh?
Comments
Listed in chronological order. Newest comments at the end.
Would wearing some of this be considered LARPing?
Posted by Expat47 in Athens, Greece on 11/27/12 at 11:41 AM
Only if you are wearing robes and pointy ears and carrying magic pouches and...
Posted by patty in Ohio, USA on 11/27/12 at 01:56 PM
I think that the display / storage case is kind of creepy in and of itself. It should be out of sight when not in use.
Also, I see this in the same vein as brassieres that are overly padded. Sort of like false advertising.
Posted by KDP in Madill, OK on 11/27/12 at 02:17 PM
I'm so glad the sideburns come in a matched set. There's nothing more disturbing than non-matching sideburns.
Posted by ges on 11/27/12 at 09:53 PM
In 1968 it was hard to get a job while wearing facial hair or long hair. Those doing the hiring weren't likely to hire long haired, bearded freaky people. I know a man whose first teaching job was at a high school and he had to shave his great handlebar moustache or lose his job. He retired from teaching with a full beard and moustache. I knew a few guys that wore wigs so they could look like they had long hair.....which wasn't really long back then. I suppose the next move would be fake facial hair. It was a very strange time during the summer of love.
Posted by ETxHippie in Home on 12/04/12 at 02:01 AM
Page 1 of 1 pages
Category: Business, Advertising, Products, Frauds, Cons and Scams, Magazines, Sexuality, 1960's, Facial Hair