Sprink

I wonder how much consumer research this company did before deciding to name their product 'Sprink'. I'm guessing they thought it was a catchy shortened form of 'sprinkle'. But the problem is that the name sounds too much like 'Stink', which is exactly the wrong association for a room-rug freshener. Must be why it doesn't seem to have been on the market more than a few months.

Rocky Mount Telegram - June 18, 1963

Cincinnati Enquirer - Oct 21, 1962

Books Selected and endorsed for Pure Weirdness by Your WU Team

Who We Are
Alex Boese Alex is the creator and curator of the Museum of Hoaxes. He's also the author of various weird, non-fiction, science-themed books such as Elephants on Acid and Psychedelic Apes. Paul Di Filippo Paul has been paid to put weird ideas into fictional form for over forty years, in his career as a noted science fiction writer. Contact Us

Posted By: Alex - Fri Feb 14, 2020
Category: Odd Names | Products | Fetishes | 1960s

Comments

Also sounds like “spank,” which can be either a good thing or a bad thing...

Posted by Brian on 02/14/20 at 11:21 PM

Or a mix between "Spring" and "Pink", which is probably what the marketing team had in mind.

Posted by Yudith on 02/15/20 at 08:18 PM

Commenting is not available in this channel entry.