Butt Cleavage Pants

I love how the opening can be any shape, such as a Chevy logo.

I also hope that Rhianna is not violating this patent!

     Posted By: Paul - Fri Jun 10, 2022
     Category: Body | Fashion | Public Indecency

Some are having a difficulty with plurals these days. A 'pant' is the ability a dog has to get more oxygen when he's winded. The clothing item is 'pants'. Don't start this with 'pliers', thank you very much for your co-operation.
Posted by Virtual in Carnate on 06/10/22 at 08:49 AM
In an episode of 'Coupling' (BBC), Jeff proposes having bottomless beaches because some women don't have what it takes to look great at a topless beach but their rear is impressive. His rationale: cleavage is cleavage, it doesn't matter which way it's pointing.

@Virtual -- for two very different reasons, you can buy a pant.

First: Recent amputees can need pants with different length legs. This usually means buying a regular pair and cutting one leg off at the desired height. That isn't good enough for some hoity-toity rehab centers, so a Swiss/German boutique makes one-side versions. Left pant and right pant are joined by velcro along the crotch/split line. You get separate pieces because you might want one standard left in denim and mating rights in below-the-knee denim for public wear and mid-thigh in cotton for medical/p.e..

Second: Theatrical costume houses sell clothing parts so wardrobe people can quickly and easily stitch together an odd costume instead of making it from scratch. The fact you can buy halves of pants and jackets was an inspiration for that weird routine where the first person is wearing white on their left and black on the right, the next person is black on the left, white right, etc. until you have six people doing a line dance which includes kicks. It's a strange optical illusion, because no matter how many times you watch it, part of your brain is saying some of them are lifting both legs.

On a related note: I do know the reason behind it, but on some level, it'll always seem strange to me that it's a pair of panties but only one bra.
Posted by Phideaux on 06/10/22 at 11:45 AM
Surely that patent is invalid because of enormous and callipygic amounts of prior art?
Posted by Richard Bos on 06/11/22 at 08:24 AM
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.