Microchip Testimony

The Georgia House Judiciary Committee was considering a bill forbidding forced microchip implanting. One might assume, for the purpose of protecting citizens of the great state of Georgia from 'the mark of the beast' when and if it becomes an issue. Well, they found themselves hearing testimony from a bonafied expert on forced micro-chipping. The woman told the committee that the Department of Defense implanted her chip in her 'vaginal-rectal area'. The bill was approved, so they must have believed her. Look for an interesting bonus factoid in extended.



The following is an unrelated subject, but one I found to be amusing. Did anyone know that April is STD Awareness Month? Did anyone know there was an STD Awareness Month at all?
     Posted By: patty - Tue Apr 20, 2010
     Category:





Comments
do you suppose someone is in trouble for vetting this woman to testify? :lol: i just had to throw the std awareness thing in there, its too funny! :lol: again!
Posted by Patty in Ohio, USA on 04/20/10 at 11:38 PM
The CDC used this image http://www.cdc.gov/Features/STDAwareness/STDAwareness_140px.jpg when holding forth facts on who has what STD. I'm sure she was advised of this use when she posed for it.
Posted by Expat47 in Athens, Greece on 04/20/10 at 11:49 PM
why did they feel it was necessary to associate any image to such sensitive information? also, is the choice an inately racist one? and how bad would someone need work to agree to have their picture appear with those facts? 😕
Posted by Patty in Ohio, USA on 04/21/10 at 06:37 AM
point taken waffles. hey bd! :lol:
Posted by Patty in Ohio, USA on 04/21/10 at 10:03 AM
and here i thought you were just being stylish honey! 😉
Posted by Patty in Ohio, USA on 04/21/10 at 10:05 AM
And just how, pray tell, does one scan for this chip? Inquiring minds want to know! I have visions of the red M&M;getting scanned at the checkout, where he scoots his fanny across the reader.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s0bCg6bbSJA
Posted by TheCannyScot in Atlanta, GA on 04/21/10 at 10:18 AM
I too have a microchip implanted in my "vaginal-rectal" area minus the vaginal.

Do we really need to include the "vaginal" part anyways? I think rectal is a sufficient proximation. I suspect the vaginal part has been added to parallel implanting with sexual abuse.

And, according to the AJC three other states have also instituted bans with Virginia attributing the microchips to the Mark of the Beast.

I imagine a majority of the people that voted against microchip voted for the Patriot Act.
How unpatriotic can we get?
Personally, I had no issues with them fiddling with my vaginal-rectal area in order to get better reception.
Posted by Pablo on 04/21/10 at 04:03 PM
not according to spell check. even so, sorry my vocabulary is better than my spelling, but atleast i have a pleasant personality. congrats on never making any mistakes yourself yasodhara.
Posted by Patty in Ohio, USA on 04/21/10 at 04:37 PM
news flash pablo, having something shoved in your 'rectal area' against your will IS sexual abuse whether or not you have a 'vaginal area'. :cheese:
Posted by Patty in Ohio, USA on 04/21/10 at 04:41 PM
Ducking and hauling ass to safety!
Posted by Expat47 in Athens, Greece on 04/22/10 at 12:13 AM
i knew that sweetie. 💋
Posted by Patty in Ohio, USA on 04/22/10 at 08:54 AM
i was just ribbing you a little sweetie! penile area? family jewel vault? home of the friendly weapon? :cheese:
Posted by Patty in Ohio, USA on 04/22/10 at 06:02 PM
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.