Category:
Insects and Spiders
Jay R Traver (1894-1974) was an entomologist at the University of Massachusetts. In 1951 she published a paper in the
Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington describing how her body had been infested by mites.
Much of the article reads like a horror story. She details the itching and crawling sensations she felt as mites crawled under her skin, and even in her eyes:
The movements of a mite that had entered under the eyelid could be felt as it crawled slowly about, then began to 'dig in' at which moment the eye suddenly became even more swollen than before.
She describes her efforts to capture the mites by digging them out of her skin, and goes into detail about the increasingly caustic substances she applied to her skin in an attempt to rid herself of the mites. She even tried radiation therapy.
The catch is that the medical community refused to believe she was actually infested by mites, and they still don't. The consensus is that she was suffering from "Delusory Parasitosis" (the false belief that one is infested by parasites). As one reviewer has noted, "the article makes no sense entomologically. The house dust mites do not and cannot parasitize humans."
You can find
her original article at archive.org, or there's
a transcript available at birdmites.org.
Incidentally, the "R" in Jay R Traver didn't stand for anything. Her middle name was R.
More info:
"Mad Scientist: the unique case of a published delusion," wikipedia
Another contender in the Great Boredom Sweepstakes.
I wrote this article about eight years ago for a site that has now gone dark. So I'm reposting it here.
The Internet has made many animals famous, such as
Grumpy Cat,
Darwin the Ikea Monkey, and
Sockington the Twitter Cat. But as this brief list suggests, Internet-famous animals tend to be either pets or species that biologists describe as "charismatic" — meaning ones that people can easily identify with. Insects don't get much love.
This hasn't always been the case. If we look back to 1932, we find an example of a spider that achieved overnight celebrity status, with the media producing daily reports of its adventures. It's the curious case of the "spider in a clock."
The Spider First Noticed
The spider's rise to fame began on the morning of November 20, 1932 at 552 Parker Ave in Barberton, Ohio (a suburb of Akron). Louise Thompson rolled over in bed, turned off her alarm clock, and then noticed a "tiny black dot" moving across the face of the timepiece.
Closer examination by her husband, Cyril, revealed that the dot was a small spider. It had somehow gotten into the space between the face of the clock and the glass, and it was attempting to spin a web between the minute and hour hands. It succeeded in briefly attaching a fine thread of gossamer between the two hands, but as the minute hand slowly advanced the thread broke. No matter. The spider climbed up the face of the clock and began its effort all over again, only to have the thread broken for a second time. The couple watched as the spider continued to repeat this cycle over and over.
The next morning the spider was still there, still trying to build its ill-fated web. And it remained there the day after, and the day after that.
The Thompsons shared the story of the clock-battling spider with their neighbors, and soon people started dropping by to see it. Eventually, someone contacted the media.
Media Fame
By the time a reporter first saw the spider — around December 7, 1932 — the insect had grown to the size of an ordinary house spider, and the hands of the clock were covered with fine threads.
How had the spider managed to grow without any obvious source of food? And how had it gotten into the clock in the first place? These were the mysteries that the spider presented.
The reporter interviewed the Thompson's two children. Young tommy thought the spider was boring, but his sister, Mary Louise, was fascinated by it, admiring the way it kept at its task despite constant defeat. She said, "He must be awfully brave."

Wilkes Barre Times Leader - Dec 10, 1932
Evidently much of the American public agreed with Mary Louise, because after the first story about the spider (distributed by the Associated Press) appeared in papers, interest in the arachnid swelled. The media responded by providing daily details of its adventures.
More in extended >>
Don't bees have intimate relations with (swimsuit women) flowers?
Yesterday, Alex regaled us with the report of
a fellow who swallowed a giraffe liver parasite in the pursuit of knowledge.
Well, here's another scientist who wanted to learn what cats went through with an ear mite infestation, choosing to insert them into his own ears.
There's a tremendous long piece about him here, even including a video!
This seems like a lot of work just to keep a few flies out of your house. And do insects really dislike entering darkened rooms?
Full patent.
In 1972, arachnidist John A. L. Cooke undertook to defend the reputation of tarantulas. Text from the
Saskatoon Star-Phoenix (Nov 2, 1972):
Like many arachnidists, Cooke is upset about public attitudes toward spiders, particularly tarantulas. In an interview, conducted in the presence of several very large live and hairy tarantulas, he pointed out that while they can inflict a moderately painful bite when angry, they are not venomous.
"I wouldn't let my 4-year-old son keep one as a pet if they were," he said.
Their bad name, he added, can be traced to the region around Taranto, in southern Italy, from which they take their name. This is the habitat of the true, or European Tarantul, whose bite was said to induce tarantism.
Webster's New International Dictionary defines tarantism as: "A nervous affection characterized by melancholy, stupor, and an uncontrollable desire to dance."
The traditional treatment was to encourage the victim to dance wildly until the effects of the poison wore off. Thus evolved the wild Neapolitan folk dance, the tarantella. According to Cooke, who is writing an article on the subject for Natural History magazine, musicians wandered through the fields at harvest time, ready to offer their services to a victim of tarantula bite.

Saskatoon Star-Phoenix - Nov 2, 1972
In his subsequent Natural History article, Cooke then revealed that it was probably black widows that had been biting the people around Taranto back in the Middle Ages. The tarantulas had been unfairly maligned:
Interestingly, it has recently been shown that even the European tarantula has been wrongly accused, that it does not inflict the dreaded bite attributed to it but is quite harmless. The real culprit in tarantism is none other than the famous black widow spider. The black widow, Latrodectus mactans, is a comparatively small, inconspicuous, and secretive member of the family Theridiidae, the comb-footed spiders. These include several common cobweb-spinning spiders found in buildings. Latrodectus, whose name comes from the Greek and means "secret biter," is a genus of world-wide distribution containing several species. Although all are highly venomous, only L. mactans is synanthropic, posing a serious threat to people.

"Despite their formidable appearance, North American tarantulas are a serious threat only to their prey—beetles and grasshoppers."
Squished passenger and allusion to an insect's posterior: winning strategy?
The story goes that Princess Caravella of Italy was found dead in her bed, shot through the heart. Her husband was accused of her murder, but during the trial a police investigator convinced the jury that the Princess had actually been killed by a moth that singed its wings on a candle in her room, then fell onto a pistol lying on her bedside table, thereby causing the weapon to fire, shooting her through the heart.
I doubt any part of this story is true. After all, I can't find any historical references to a "Princess Caravella" other than the ones about her strange death. But the story was printed repeatedly in newspapers during the first half of the twentieth, always presented as an odd but true tale.
The earliest account of the story I can find dates to 1895, where it was credited to the
New York World. I assume a reporter for the
New York World made it up.

Chicago Chronicle - Dec 29, 1895
Here's a slightly shorter version of the story from 1937.

Tunkhannock New Age - Feb 18, 1937
I can't find the story in papers after the 1940s, but it did continue to pop up in books about odd trivia and weird deaths. For instance, below is a version that appeared in the 1985 weird-news book
Own Goals by Graham Jones. Note that Jones identified Princess Caravella only as an "Italian wife," making the story seem more contemporary.