Beatrice Turner wasn't known by the public as an artist during her life. In fact, she wasn't known by many people period, since she rarely ventured out of her Newport mansion (which was painted completely black). But when she died in 1948 over a thousand paintings done by her were found. Most of them were self-portraits.
The paintings have attracted the interest of psychologists since how she portrayed herself on canvas was evidently how she saw herself in her mind's eye, but it didn't match physical reality. Text from "Psychiatry and skin disease" by J.A. Cotterill:
It is no accident that body image is often inappropriately younger in a given individual than it appears to others. Thus, many artists painting their own portraits represent themselves as a much younger person than they actually are. This aspect of art was highlighted by MacDonald Critchley when he described the portraits of Beatrice Turner, who at 58 was still painting herself to look like a woman years younger than she actually was. Moreover, this artist painted a nude self-portrait of herself showing a young woman of ample proportions, shortly before she died, thin and emaciated from starvation.
In a 1973 article in The Lancet ("Habituation to occlusive dressings"), two British doctors described patients who seemed to be addicted to wearing bandages, continuing to wear them years after their skin conditions had healed.
Pittsburgh Press - July 29, 1973
Text from "Psychiatry and skin disease" by J.A. Cotterill, in Recent Advances in Dermatology. No. 6. (1983):
Habituation to occlusive dressings is a halfway house between artefact and organic disease. Liddell & Cotterill (1973)* described 11 patients who became habituated to occlusive bandages which had been prescribed many years previously for either gravitational ulcers or eczema of the legs. Although the skin in all patients had returned to normal it was impossible to persuade these patients to abandon this occlusive therapy. All attempts at discharging the patient from the clinic failed. Bribes in the form of chocolates, cigars or alcohol were commonly brought to the clinic as inducements for the status quo to continue. The patients were usually lonely, socially isolated and, if male, unemployed. Four male patients in this group had successfully avoided work on account of their alleged skin disease for years.
*Liddell K, Cotterill JA (1973). "Habituation to occlusive dressings." Lancet 1: 1485-1486.
Researchers have uncovered the "social dimensions of urination" among captive chimpanzees. This topic had previously been "largely unexplored."
They recorded urination events for a total of 604 hours and calculated urination frequency for each subject. They report:
Contagious urination, like other forms of behavioral and emotional state matching, may have important implications in establishing and maintaining social cohesion, in addition to potential roles in preparation for collective departure (i.e. voiding before long-distance travel) and territorial scent-marking (i.e. coordination of chemosensory signals)...
we find that in captive chimpanzees the act of urination is socially contagious. Further, low-dominance individuals had higher rates of contagion.
I guess the obvious question is whether humans also are susceptible to contagious urination. I haven't noticed it, if we are.
In grocery stores, fresh produce such as bananas and tomatoes often goes to waste if it's become a "loose single." Shoppers think it's damaged or imperfect.
German researchers have come up with a way to address this problem: make shoppers think the produce is feeling sad because it hasn't been bought.
This is achieved simply by displaying an anthropomorphized picture of sad produce above the singles.
The produce has to be sad. Happy fruits and vegetables don't motivate shoppers.
Also, making produce sad works better than offering a price discount, because shoppers often assume discounted food must be bad.
Marketing psychologist Ernest Dichter argued that home buyers place great emphasis on the feel of doorknobs when looking at a house, because "The doorknob offers the only way you can caress a house."
Clipping from "Emotion brings out the buying power," by Roger Ricklefs in The Sunbury Daily Item (Nov 21, 1972):
As a leader of the "qualitative" school of motivational research, [Ernest Dichter] believes that the real reason people buy one product over another is often a deep-seated emotion. Psyche in depth will reveal it, he thinks.
Why do big doorknobs help sell a house? Why do some men become irrationally hostile when their sock drawers are empty? Such are the questions that intrigue researchers like Mr. Dichter...
in the past two or three years Du Pont, Alcoa, General Mills, Procter & Gamble, Colgate-Palmolive, Johnson & Johnson, Schenley Industries and dozens of other well-known companies have commissioned studies from Mr. Dichter's Institute for Motivational Research here. The institute has annual volume of $600,000 and profits of $80,000 to $100,000.
Many people find Dichter's interpretations far-fetched. But people who accept the basic beliefs of modern psychologists find them quite plausible.
The psychologist says he's found that even a commonplace object like a doorknob has a surprising emotional significance to buyers.
"The doorknob offers the only way you can caress a house; you can't caress the walls," he says. "The way a product fills a hand is very important. How a handle does this will make an engineer prefer one technical product over another — and he doesn't even realize it," Mr. Dichter says.
During part of a baby's embryonic development, the thumb fills the palm of the hand, Mr. Dichter says. The new-born infant thus exhibits a strong desire to grasp objects, possibly to fill the palm of the hand again, the psychologist adds.
As he sees it, the same instinct later prompts a sub-conscious tendency to judge a house by its doorknob or a tool by its handle. Mr. Dichter says these findings and theories prompted a California lockmaker to enlarge the doorknobs it manufactured.
Even men's socks can inspire passion, Mr. Dichter asserts. "We find that an empty sock drawer is a symbol of an empty heart," Mr. Dichter said in a study for Du Pont's hosiery section. "When the husband finds that his sock drawer is not overflowing, he interprets his wife's neglect as symptomatic of her lack of consideration, concern and love."
One of the minor weird-news themes we track here on WU is that of people who are so engrossed in whatever they're doing that they're unfazed by the building burning around them. (See the previous posts "Can't miss the show", "Unfazed by fire", and "The Smoke-Filled Room").
The phenomenon was seen recently at a Ramen Jiro restaurant in Tokyo. As thick smoke began to fill the restaurant, the diners inside simply continued to eat their noodles as if nothing was wrong. More info: SoraNews24
Back in the early 1970s, a German research group called "The Society for Rational Psychology" challenged 184 people (all regular TV watchers) to go without TV for a year.. with financial incentives to encourage them to stick to the plan.
Briefly all went well, but then things quickly began to go downhill. Frustration grew. The people started to become moody and aggressive. After five months they were all back to watching TV.
The lesson the researchers concluded: "people who watch television regularly are likely to become so addicted they can no longer be happy without it."
What would they conclude about the Internet?
Of course, the study probably needs to be taken with a grain of salt because I can't find any info about this Society for Rational Psychology. Was it some kind of market research group? Nor can I find the write-up from the study itself. Just lots of references to the study in the media.
Paul Di Filippo
Paul has been paid to put weird ideas into fictional form for over thirty years, in his career as a noted science fiction writer. He has recently begun blogging on many curious topics with three fellow writers at The Inferior 4+1.